Legal Opinion

Beauchamp v. Consolidated School District No. 4

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 2, 1923PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJames T. Blair, J.

This is a suit to enjoin respondent district and its officers and directors from issuing and selling certain bonds pursuant to an election held in the district. The trial court refused to grant an injunction, and this appeal followed.

Appellant is a resident taxpaying citizen of the respondent Consolidated School District. March 16, 1922, there was a meeting of the directors of the district, which all attended, save one who was notified but could not be present. Among other things the board voted to “submit to the qualified voters of Consolidated District No. 4 a proposition to authorize the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. O'Laughlin v. City of KirkwoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 1904
  2. State ex inf. Carnahan v. JonesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1915
  3. State ex inf. Simrall v. ClardySupreme Court of Missouri · 1916
  4. Bauch v. City of CaboolMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ashcraft v. B'd. of Sup'vrs. Hinds Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Tom v. Board of County Com'rs of Lincoln CountyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Montgomery v. Reorganized School District No. 1Supreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  4. State Ex Rel. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. DarbySupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  5. Board of Com'rs of Guadalupe County v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API