Parker v. Furlow Development Co.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtStetjer, J.
The motion to dismiss the complaint is made upon two grounds both of which require discussion. The action is by one of three executors of the late Kingdon Gould. The complaint alleges that the deceased “ advanced ” to defendant corporation a certain sum of money and it seeks the recovery of that sum. The question is what is meant by “ advance ” in the sense that it is used in the complaint. The word has had judicial definition in the construction of wills (Matter of Altman, 6 N. Y. S. 2d 972; Matter of Moran, 136 Misc. 615). But there the inquiry was what the testator meant under the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fritz v. City Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
- In re the Estate of MoranNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930
- In re EhretNew York Supreme Court · 1911
- Cumming v. Middletown, Unionville & Water Gap RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911