Legal Opinion

United States v. Ruben Magdaniel-Mora, Henny Dekom, Ibrahim Nunez, Francisco Vicente-Leon and Felix Calvo-Castillo

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided November 13, 1984No. 83-5008Published

1Opinion of the Court

746 F.2d 715

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Ruben MAGDANIEL-MORA, Henny Dekom, Ibrahim Nunez, Francisco

Vicente-Leon and Felix Calvo-Castillo,

Defendants-Appellants.

No. 83-5008.

United States Court of Appeals,

Eleventh Circuit.

Nov. 13, 1984.

Dennis G. Kainen, Asst. Federal Public Defender, Miami, Fla., for Magdaniel-Mora and Dekom.

Raymond J. Takiff, Coconut Grove, Fla., for Nunez.

Roberto Martinez, Linda Collins Hertz, Asst. U.S. Attys., Miami, Fla., for U.S.

Mark King Leban, Miami, Fla., for Vicente-Leon and Calvo-Castillo.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Jenkins v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. United States v. Nelson BellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  5. Roberts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API