Legal Opinion

Boyd v. Urrutia

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 26, 1917No. 683PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from District Court, El Paso County; Ballard Goldwell, Judge. Suit by Sabino Urrutia against A. I. Boyd and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

This suit was instituted by Sabino Urrutia against A. I. Boyd, J. G. D. Boyd, and L. E. Booker to recover the unpaid balance of a note, interest, and attorney's fees executed by A. I. Boyd and at the time (before delivery) of its execution indorsed upon the back by L. E. Booker and J. G. D. Boyd.

A judgment by default for the amount sued for was entered by the trial court which recites:

"The defendants, though each and all of them were duly cited and served with process in terms of the law, came not, but each and all of said defendants wholly made default."

Preliminary to passing upon the merits…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McDonald v. CabinessTexas Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Latham v. Houston Flour MillsTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Kuykendall v. CoulterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894
  4. Norris Implement Co. v. OgdenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  5. O'Donnell v. KirkesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Shannon v. ChildersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  2. Dempsey v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  3. Briggs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
  4. Allais v. LynchCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  5. Shannon v. ChildersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API