Tanzer v. Health Insurance Plan of Greater New York
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the order of Supreme Court reinstated.
Plaintiff brought this action on behalf of herself and others similarly situated to recover insurance reimbursement for the cost of surgery-related anesthesiologist’s services. Defendant insurer contends that such costs cannot be recovered because the parties’ insurance contract, which covers the cost of certain medical and surgical care, contains a specific exclusion for "anesthesia.” We agree with plaintiff, however, that this exclusion does not…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Seaboard Surety Co. v. Gillette Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Rapid-American Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Stanski v. EzerskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Morgan v. McPhailSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Norris v. DetrickDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Vigilant Insurance v. V.I. Technologies, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Cohoes Realty Associates v. Lexington InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998