Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Goldstine v. Noble Circuit Court

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1959No. 0-572Published

1Per curiam

The petitioner herein has filed what purports to be a petition for a writ of mandamus. He is attempting to mandate the Noble Circuit Court to hear a “Verified Petition To Set Aside and Hold for Naught Void Judgment.”

Supreme Court Rule 2-35, in relation to writs of mandate provides, in part: “If the relief sought relates to a proceeding in an inferior court certified copies of all pleadings, orders and entries pertaining to the subject matter should be set out in the petition or made exhibits thereto.”

Petitioner has not complied with Rule 2-35, as above quoted, nor has he made a good faith…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Teeple v. State ex rel. BowerIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  2. State Ex Rel. Fritz v. Delaware Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API