Legal Opinion

Ex Parte McDanal

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 4, 1946No. 6 Div. 333Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing.

HARWOOD, Judge.

In his brief on application for rehearing in this case, counsel for petitioner strenuously argues for error in our original decision denying the rule nisi and peremptory writ. It is urged that certiorari may not be made to take the place of an appeal, and that the application made to the circuit court for a writ of certiorari to the intermediate civil court contained no proper ground for the issuance of the writ. Upon this premise counsel for petitioner reaches the conclusion that the order of the circuit judge granting'the petition for certiorari to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Max J. Winkler Brokerage Co. v. CoursonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  2. Roddam v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  3. Washington v. ParkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
  4. Holland-Blow Stave Co. v. WhitmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  5. Smith v. Atlanta Guano Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1902

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API