Legal Opinion
State Mutual Insurance v. Strickland
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided June 25, 1962No. 21687PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Duckworth, Chief Justice.
Since, under certain circumstances there may be a mutual departure from an executory contract, in which ease notice of intention to return to the original contract is essential to its enforcement (Code § 20-116), yet the allegations of such departure as relate to the time of payment of monthly installments are sufficient to require an overruling of the general demurrers insofar as this matter is concerned. The issue of fact thus made is one for determination of a jury and not one of law. Powell v. Mars Oil Co., 214 Ga. 710 (107 SE2d 208). As to the legal requirements…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bearden Mercantile Co. v. Madison Oil Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Southern Feed Stores v. SandersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Clisby v. City of MacOnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Byrd v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
- Holloway v. De VaneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Mayer v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Southwest Plaster & Drywall Co. v. R. S. Armstrong & Bros.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Marsh v. BerensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
- Shalom Farms, Inc. v. Columbus Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Jaraysi v. SebastianCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.