Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Ross

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 2010No. 2009-1619Published

1DissentBrown, C.J.

{¶ 53} The court of appeals cogently summarized the issue now before this court as follows: “[W]hether, once a trial court has denied a motion for acquittal that was properly filed within 14 days after the jury was discharged following a mistrial, the trial court has authority to reconsider that denial.” State v. Ross, 184 Ohio App.3d 174, 2009-Ohio-3561, 920 N.E.2d 162, ¶ 16. The majority holds that the answer to this inquiry is “no.” I disagree. In my view, the court of appeals correctly recognized that the trial court’s initial denial of a timely filed Crim.R. 29(C) motion (motion for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pitts v. Ohio Department of TransportationOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. RossOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Olson v. WatsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1936
  4. Wayne Co. Nat Bk v. Predmore-Henry Motor Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API