State v. Ross
Ohio Supreme Court
1DissentBrown, C.J.
{¶ 53} The court of appeals cogently summarized the issue now before this court as follows: “[W]hether, once a trial court has denied a motion for acquittal that was properly filed within 14 days after the jury was discharged following a mistrial, the trial court has authority to reconsider that denial.” State v. Ross, 184 Ohio App.3d 174, 2009-Ohio-3561, 920 N.E.2d 162, ¶ 16. The majority holds that the answer to this inquiry is “no.” I disagree. In my view, the court of appeals correctly recognized that the trial court’s initial denial of a timely filed Crim.R. 29(C) motion (motion for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pitts v. Ohio Department of TransportationOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. RossOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
- Olson v. WatsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1936
- Wayne Co. Nat Bk v. Predmore-Henry Motor Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1928