Folsom v. Carnley
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
Plaintiff sued in statutory detinue for the automobile seized in the collection of taxes and sold by the tax collector, and for damages for its detention.
There was no error in denying the motion for a new trial on the ground and facts as to waiver stated. Hurt v. Southern Ry. Co., 205 Ala. 179, 182, 87 South. 533.
The suit was filed July 11, 1921, shortly after the automobile had been taken into possession of defendant; on July 14 replevin bond was given and the possession restored to defendant; and on July 22 the alleged tax sale was made by the tax collector. Prior to the taking of the car…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Dows v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Barrington v. BarringtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Alabama Gold Life Insurance v. LottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
- Gwin v. Emerald Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1918
- Bedsole v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Howard v. State Ex Rel. McGarrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Miller-Brent Lumber Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Wall-Hay-Wall Lumber Co. v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Lacy v. Alabama Power CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 2000