Legal Opinion

In re Grant Avenue

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1901PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Objections to the report of the commissioners- of estimate and assessment. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLawrence, J.

Objections are made to the confirmation of the report of the commissioners of estimate and assessment in this proceeding on behalf of Thomas O’Rourke, Archibald Rogers and the trustees for John Jacob Astor. Messrs. McCarty & Baldwin, representing Thomas O’Rourke, claim that he is unjustly assessed as the owner of the property designated as No. 128 on the benefit map, for the reason that an irregular strip of land is left lying between the easterly side of said property and the westerly side of Grant avenue as proposed to be opened, said strip measuring about ten feet on its northerly and four…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API