Legal Opinion
Foltz v. GEICO Indemnity Company
District Court, E.D. California
Decided August 20, 2021No. 1:21-cv-00131Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAMIE LYNN FOLTZ, No. 1:21-cv-00131-DAD-SAB 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND 14 GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY, and Does 1 through 25, inclusive, (Doc. No. 9) 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 This matter is before the court on plaintiff Jamie Lynn Foltz’s motion to remand this 19 action to the Fresno County Superior Court. (Doc. No. 9.) Pursuant to General Order No. 617 20 addressing the public health emergency posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, on February 24, 21 2021, plaintiff’s motion…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hunter v. Philip Morris USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Carvalho v. Equifax Information Services, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- 14 soc.sec.rep.ser. 301, unempl.ins.rep. Cch 16,883 Ernest S. Avery v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- Leticia Valdez v. Allstate Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation Allstate Indemnity Co., an Illinois CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Shanna Kuxhausen v. Bmw Financial Services Na LlcCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.