Legal Opinion
Thomas v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided December 12, 1989No. 56584PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
Movant appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
3Cited by4 opinions
- PGI, INC. v. Rathe Productions, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2003
- Finch v. CampbellMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- 8182 Maryland Associates, Ltd. Partnership v. SheehanSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
- A.M. v. Bridgecrest Acceptance CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021