Legal Opinion

Thomas v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 12, 1989No. 56584PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

Movant appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. PGI, INC. v. Rathe Productions, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2003
  2. Finch v. CampbellMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. 8182 Maryland Associates, Ltd. Partnership v. SheehanSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
  4. A.M. v. Bridgecrest Acceptance CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021