Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Lena Robertson,etc. v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided August 27, 2002No. 3431012Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partElder, J.

I concur in the majority’s decision affirming the commission’s denial of temporary total disability benefits. However, I disagree that our holding in Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. v. Williams, 10 Va.App. 516, 392 S.E.2d 846 (1990), compels the commission’s conclusion that the permanent partial disability benefits awarded for Charles Roberston’s asbestosis should be calculated based on the average weekly wage he earned before voluntarily retiring in 1973. Therefore, I respectfully dissent from this portion of the majority opinion.

The claimant in Williams sought temporary total disability…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Blue Diamond Coal Company v. PannellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1961
  2. Parris v. Appalachian Power Co.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 1986
  3. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1990
  4. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  5. Newton v. Fairfax County Police DepartmentSupreme Court of Virginia · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API