Legal Opinion

Veasey v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided February 17, 1925No. 4 Div. 977PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBricken, P. J.

Charge 2 refused to defendant is as follows:

“The court charges the jury, if the jury, upon considering all the evidence, have a reasonable doubt about the defendant’s guilt, arising out of any part of the evidence, they should find him not guüty.”

This charge was not covered by the oral charge, nor by the given charges. It stated a correct proposition of law, and should have been given. For its refusal there is no escape from reversing the judgment of conviction appealed from. This identical charge has been approved many times by the Supreme Court, and by this court. See Townsend v. State, 18…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Prince v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  2. Roberson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  3. Campbell v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  4. Walker v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  5. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  2. Willie Ray Harrell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  3. Brown v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1946
  4. Sanford v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1954
  5. Bufford v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1930

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API