Legal Opinion
Marum v. Marum
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 24, 1959PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBernard S. Meyer, J.
This motion for an order striking the answer of defendant and directing the entry of judgment for plaintiff, is granted to the extent of rendering partial judgment in favor of plaintiff declaring that he is the owner in fee of the premises which are the subject of the action and directing, pursuant to the provisions of section 985 of the Civil Practice Act, that possession of said premises be delivered to plaintiff within 15 days after the service upon defendant or her attorney of a copy of the order to be entered hereon with notice of entry. The answer will, however, be allowed to stand as a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Foreman v. ForemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- In Re the Accounting of GoldbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Vincent v. MoriartyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- Di Niscia v. OlseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
- Angresani v. TozziAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Musso v. Tesmetges (In Re Tesmetges)District Court, E.D. New York · 1984
- Scivoletti v. MarsalaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- McCall v. FramptonNew York Supreme Court · 1979
- Billson Housing Corp. v. HarrisonNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- Anderman v. 1395 E. 52nd Street Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.