Legal Opinion

Helvering v. Kaufmann

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided May 28, 1943No. Nos. 5044-5047PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SOPER, Circuit Judge.

The E. M. Rosenthal Jewelry Company, a corporation of the District of Columbia, made a distribution of stock to its stockholders, the taxpayers in these consolidated cases, in a transaction which originated in 1933 and included the delivery of the stock certificates in 1934. The distribution took place in pursuance of a plan of corporate reorganization, and if it was effected in 1933 as the Board of Tax Appeals held, 46 B.T.A. 924, it came within the terms of § 112(g) of the Revenue Act of 1932, 47 Stat. 169, 26 U.S.C.A. Int.Rev.Acts, page 513, and no taxable gain to the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Palmer v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Avery v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Mason v. RoutzahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Hadley v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1929
  5. AD Saenger, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Meyer v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1966
  2. Byrne v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1970
  3. Commissioner v. KaufmannCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
  4. Blount v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1993
  5. Byrne v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API