Legal Opinion

Robertson v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided August 16, 1994No. 07-93-0452-CRPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOYD, Justice.

In one point of error, appellant David Eugene Robertson challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain his conviction of the offense of criminal mischief, enhanced by prior felony convictions 1 to a second degree felony. The trial court assessed punishment at twenty-five (25) years confinement in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. For the reasons hereinafter stated, we must reverse the judgment of the trial court.

On September 29, 1992, officers of the Amarillo Police Department assigned to the Panhandle Regional Narcotics Trafficking…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Greene v. MasseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Turro v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  5. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. Joe Shawn Hollander v. State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2012
  3. Doyle v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2004
  4. Carlos Arias v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2011
  5. Carlos Arias v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2011

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API