Legal Opinion · Dissent

Armando Ybarra v. M. Stainer

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 3, 2015No. 12-56901Unpublished

1DissentD.W. Nelson, Senior Circuit Judge

Because I would reverse the district court with instructions to grant the petition, I respectfully dissent.

I would not accord AEDPA deference to the state court decision. The state court did not analyze the plea agreement pursu*715ant to state contract law, as required under clearly established federal law. Buckley v. Terhune, 441 F.3d 688, 695 (9th Cir.2006) (en banc). I therefore would review the petition de novo. .

California contract law provides three steps for construing a plea agreement. First, we look to the plain meaning of the language in the agreement. Id. (citing Cal. Civ.Code §§ 1638,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brian A. Buckley v. C.A. Terhune, Director of the California Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  2. People v. SheltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API