Legal Opinion

Woodrome v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 30, 1990No. 16353PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOGAN, Judge.

On July 14, 1987, a jury found appellant Clinton E. Woodrome (hereinafter defen*545dant) guilty of escape from confinement in violation of § 575.210, RSMo 1986, and assessed his punishment at imprisonment for a term of 5 years, to be served consecutive to the term the defendant was serving. On appeal, defendant’s conviction was affirmed. State v. Woodrome, 758 S.W.2d 136 (Mo.App.1988).

On November 16, 1988, defendant filed a pro se motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Rule 29.15. The burden of defendant’s motion was that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel upon…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Day v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  2. Malone v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Cheek v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. State v. WoodromeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Watson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2017
  2. Fincher v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. State v. IvyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Taylor v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API