Legal Opinion

Hines Nurseries, Inc. v. Plumstead Township Board of Supervisors

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 20, 2004PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*921OPINION BY

Judge COHN.

Ari Van Wingerden (Van Wingerden) appeals from that portion of the February 11, 2002 order of the Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County that affirmed the decision of the Plumstead Township (Township) Board of Supervisors (Board) to attach certain conditions to the Subdivision and Land Development Application (Application) filed by Hines Nurseries, Inc. Va Hines Color (Hines). Van Wing-erden challenges three of nine conditions imposed by the Board, and presents the following issues for the Court’s review: (1) the Application should be deemed approved without conditions…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Schubach v. SilverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Cleaver v. Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. Michener AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Mulac AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Christman v. Zoning Hearing Board of the Township of WindsorCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Hines Nurseries, Inc. v. Plumstead Township Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API