Legal Opinion

Eunice v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 10, 1928No. 19008PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.

1. The court did not err in instructing the jury that, “one question in a criminal case being in regard to a county line, so as to fix the venue, hearsay evidence is admissible.” Wimbish v. State, 70 Ga. 718 (3); Riley v. Griffin, 16 Ga. 142 (18) (60 Am. D. 726).

2. “The grounds of the motion for a new trial which complain of the refusal of certain requests to charge are not complete and understandable within themselves, as none of them show or even allege that the requested instructions were adapted to the facts of the case or were authorized by any evidence adduced. Beavers v. State, 33 Ga.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Beavers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  2. Brazil v. City or LaGrangeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
  3. Sandersville Railroad v. McDanielCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rider v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  2. Ellison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  3. Cheves v. HitzCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API