Legal Opinion

de Lancey v. Heylman

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1910Published

Demurrers to a complaint in partition.

1Opinion of the CourtBrady, J.

The -complaint herein, besides other relief, seeks the partition or sale of three separate parcels of land numbered therein parcels 1, 2 and. 3. It appears therefrom that the plaintiff and the defendants Emma A. Heylman and Henry B. Heylman are each* seized in fee of. an equal undivided one-third part of or interest in parcels Hos. 1 and 3, and that parcel Ho. 2 is owned by the plaintiff and the defendant Emma A. Heylman alone, one-third being vested in plaintiff and two-thirds in the defendant Emma A. Heylman, the defendant Henry B. Heylman not being a tenant in common with plaintiff…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mayor v. . CoffinNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  2. Beach v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Jackson ex dem. Wynkoop v. MyersNew York Supreme Court · 1817

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API