Vereycken v. VandenBrooks
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Bay. (Cobb, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. 'The facts are stated in tbe opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
This is an action brought to recover an alleged overpayment of interest upon a real-estate mortgage and note.
April 14, 1879, plaintiff gave his promissory note to Antoinette VandenBrooks for $460, with interest at 10 per cent, per annum, due in three years from its date. The note remained unpaid. On the 2d of August, 1885, VandenBrooks gave the plaintiff a written agreement as follows:
“ I, A. VandenBrooks, agree to let Frank Vereycken have all the money at 8 per cent.
“A. VandenBrooks.”
The note remained unpaid until September 18, 1891, when proceedings were instituted in the circuit court, in *121c…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Joannin v. OgilvieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- State ex rel. McCardy v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Pemberton v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
- Oceanic Steamship Co. v. TappanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1879
3Cited by4 opinions
- Carey v. FitzpatrickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Nolan v. GreeleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Warren v. Federal Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Barnard v. PatersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1904