Legal Opinion
Couch v. City of Villa Rica
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided March 29, 1962No. Civ. A. Nos. 466, 486PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MORGAN, District Judge.
STATEMENT OF CASE
Mrs. Marie Couch and Mrs. Eva Broom, each as petitioners, filed a proceeding in nature of mandamus under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rules 69(a), 81(b), 28 U.S.C.A., against the City of Villa Rica, Georgia, a municipal corporation, and named persons as the mayor and council of the city. Thereafter, petitioners amended, adding certain named tax assessors for the municipality as defendants. It was alleged that on June 3,1959, the petitioner Mrs. Marie Couch obtained a judgment in this Court in the principal sum of $27,500.00 plus costs of court,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Richmond County v. SteedSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
- City of Atlanta v. WrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Georgia Public-Service Commission v. City of AlbanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
- City of Villa Rica and Southern Natural Gas Company v. Mrs. Marie Couch and Mrs. Eva Broom, Southern Natural Gas Company v. Mrs. Winnie Leathers DyerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
- Messenheimer v. WindtSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Murdock v. City of Jacksonville, FloridaDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1973
- C-Staff, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
- Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. C-Staff, Inc., Thomas Keesee, Kbas I, L.L.C., Continental Benefit Administrators, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. C-Staff, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002