Legal Opinion

Dorman v. Langlinais

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 6, 1979No. 8335PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIES, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff below, Winifred Dorman, sued defendant below, Kenneth Langlinais, for damages for personal injuries and property damages as the result of an intersectional automobile collision. Defendant counterclaimed for personal injuries and property damage. Trial was to a jury which acquitted defendant of any negligence and found plaintiff one hundred percent negligent. A monetary judgment for defendant followed from which plaintiff below perfects this appeal. The parties will be referred to as they were below.

Plaintiff’s first point urges the trial court erred in excluding…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Union Oil Co. of California v. RichardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  2. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. FerrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  3. Ford Motor Co. v. WhittCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  4. McCarty v. PurserTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Coleman v. DonahoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Bedford v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2005
  2. McInnes v. Yamaha Motor Corp., U.S.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1983
  3. Trans-State Pavers, Inc. v. Haynes, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1991
  4. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. O'Merry, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1987
  5. Nichols v. Howard Trucking Co., Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API