Legal Opinion

Mehle v. McLean

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 15, 1932No. 13833PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWesterfield, J.

• This is a suit for $105.30 on a dishonored check. The defense is that the check was not supported by valuable consideration, being the result of a transaction contra bonos mores.

There was judgment below in favor of defendant, and plaintiff has appealed.

The check sued on was issued in payment of a bet on a race horse. David A. McLean, who issued the check and whose legal representative is made defendant in this suit, McLean having died shortly after issuing the check, was a member of the veterinary firm of. McLean & Karstendieck. Plaintiff placed a .bet with McLean, through an employee, on a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of New Orleans v. CollinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1900
  2. City of Shreveport v. MaloneySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
  3. Grayson v. WhatleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1860
  4. Town of Marksville v. WorthySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
  5. Moore v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1852

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gandolfo v. Louisiana State Racing CommissionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
  2. Kennedy v. Annandale Boys Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1980
  3. Gandolfo v. Louisiana State Racing CommissionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
  4. Gandolfo v. Louisiana State Racing CommissionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API