Legal Opinion
Peabody Coal Co. v. Greer
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 16, 1995No. 94-3534PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge.
Peabody Coal Company (“Peabody”) and Old Republic Insurance Company, the petitioners, appeal the Benefit Review Board’s (“Board”) affirmance of an Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ) award for Harold Greer, the respondent, and the Board’s subsequent denial of Peabody’s motion for reconsideration. Originally, the ALJ denied benefits to Greer, but after the relevant law changed, she reconsidered and granted benefits. Peabody appealed because it never had the opportunity to present evidence and rebut claims under the new legal standard. Although the Board rejected…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs v. Greenwich CollieriesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Pauley v. BethEnergy Mines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Lewis Gibas v. Saginaw Mining Company Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs and Benefits Review BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Eastover Mining Co. v. Dorothy S. Williams and Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Consolidation Coal Co. v. McMahonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- A & E Coal Co. v. James AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Peabody Coal Co. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation ProgramsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Peabody Coal Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.