Legal Opinion

SPS Technologies v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 7, 2006PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Senior Judge FLAHERTY.

SPS Technologies (SPS) has filed a petition for review nunc pro tunc and/or to preserve filing date and accept appeal as properly filed petition for review from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed the decision of a Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) granting the petition to review compensation benefits filed by Marla Getz Marko (Claimant). In response, Claimant has filed a motion to quash. We grant Claimant’s motion to quash.

*50In addressing the motion to quash, we observe that the timeline in this case reveals that the Board…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Riddle v. Com., Dept. of Transp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Carolina Freight Carriers Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. J. and L. Delaney, Foster Family Home v. DHSCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Jessieco, Inc. v. WCAB (McCutcheon)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  3. S. & G. Corsnitz v. DEPCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API