SPS Technologies v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Senior Judge FLAHERTY.
SPS Technologies (SPS) has filed a petition for review nunc pro tunc and/or to preserve filing date and accept appeal as properly filed petition for review from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed the decision of a Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) granting the petition to review compensation benefits filed by Marla Getz Marko (Claimant). In response, Claimant has filed a motion to quash. We grant Claimant’s motion to quash.
*50In addressing the motion to quash, we observe that the timeline in this case reveals that the Board…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Riddle v. Com., Dept. of Transp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Carolina Freight Carriers Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
3Cited by3 opinions
- J. and L. Delaney, Foster Family Home v. DHSCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Jessieco, Inc. v. WCAB (McCutcheon)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
- S. & G. Corsnitz v. DEPCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019