Fox v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
NEBEKER, Associate Judge:
After a jury trial appellant Fox was convicted of second-degree murder while armed, D.C.Code 1973, §§ 22-2403, -3202. Although appellant raises four issues on appeal, we need to discuss only two, both of which are evidentiary in nature. 1 He contends that the trial court erred in (1) admitting, over timely objection, the victim’s hearsay statement that she feared the appellant, and (2) failing to grant motions of judgment of acquittal. We agree with appellant’s first contention that the trial court committed reversible error in admitting inadmissible hearsay testimony…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Curley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
- United States v. Roland W. BrownCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- Jefferson Crawford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Irick v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Nelson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Head v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Mills v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Clark v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.