Latourette v. Kruse

It is urged by appealing plaintiff that the proceedings in the county court instituted for the purpose of altering said road were void abinitio for want of jurisdiction, because certified copies of the resolution initiating the proceedings were not posted and notices of the proceedings were not mailed to the record owners as required by the statute. (Session Laws, 1927, Chapter 155.)

It is also urged by said plaintiff that even if the proceedings were valid, they are in abeyance, because of an appeal taken from the order of the county court declaring the road established, and no order was made…