Legal Opinion

United States v. Great Northern Ry. Co.

District Court, E.D. Washington

Decided November 28, 1906PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhitson, District Judge

This cause was tried by the court, a jury having been waived. The complaint contains six causes of action, but there is no controversy except as to the first. The evidence shows that the car in that cause of action described had the equipment required by law, hut was being used in interstate traffic while the chain which connected the lock pin with the uncoupling lever was not attached; that a brakeman could not couple or uncouple the cars without' going between them.

*230. I was at first impressed with the soundness of the contention of counsel for defendant that, the equipment itself being upon…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. VoelkerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
  3. Voelker v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Iowa · 1902
  4. United States v. Southern Ry. Co.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 1905

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. DelkCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1908
  2. United States v. Illinois Cent. R.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1907
  3. United States v. Southern Pac. Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1907
  4. United States v. Chicago, B. & Q. Ry. Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1907
  5. United States v. Oregon Short Line Ry. Co.District Court, D. Idaho · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API