Legal Opinion

Hyams v. CVS Health Corporation

District Court, N.D. California

Decided December 11, 2019No. 4:18-cv-06271Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 San Francisco Division 11 RYAN HYAMS, Case No. 18-cv-06271-PJH (LB) 12 Plaintiff, DISCOVERY ORDER REGARDING (1) PATIENT-SAFETY WORK 13 v. PRODUCT PRIVILEGE AND (2) BURDEN AND 14 CVS HEALTH CORPORATION, et al., PROPORTIONALITY 15 Defendants. Re: ECF No. 99, 115, 126, 129, 130, 132 16 17 INTRODUCTION 18 The court assumes the reader’s familiarity with the subject matter and procedural history of 19 this case. The parties have raised more discovery disputes, regarding (1) patient-safety work 20 product (“PSWP”)…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Francisco Vasquez v. County of Los Angeles, Erroneously Sued as Los Angeles County Board of SupervisorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  2. Loving v. Department of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
  3. Federal Trade Commission v. Warner Communications Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  4. Day v. Sears Holdings Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2013
  5. Essex Insurance Company v. Stage 2, Incorporated, an Illinois Corporation, and Drew LuchtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API