Legal Opinion
MacK v. United States
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided June 29, 1994No. CV 94-113 TUC JMRPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER & MEMORANDUM DECISION
ROLL, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Pending before the Court is plaintiff Graham County Sheriff Richard Mack’s complaint for injunctive and declaratory relief against the enforcement of 18 U.S.C. § 922(s), commonly referred to as the Brady Act. For the reasons set forth below, the Court finds that subsection 922(s)(2) violates the Fifth and Tenth Amendments of the United States Constitution and will enter partial judgment in favor of the plaintiff on that basis.
The Brady Act
This lawsuit is a challenge to the constitutionality of public law 103-159,107 Stat. 1536…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Printz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Behrens v. Wometco Enterprises, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1988
- Mack v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- City of Phila. v. SessionsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- Peoples Rights Organization, Inc. v. MontgomeryOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.