Legal Opinion

Jackson Fibre Co. v. Meadows

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 4, 1908No. 1,732PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Tennessee.

1Opinion of the Court

RICHARDS, Circuit Judge.

The defendant below, the Jackson Fibre Company, owned and operated a cotton factory in Tennessee, and, in connection with it, a private telephone and signal system running, by poles and wires, from its office to its barn. The plaintiff below, Meadows, did the general electrical work upon this system, keeping it in repair. He was not a lineman, nor had he ever worked for a telephone company. He states he was assistant electrician, the master mechanic, Mr. AVadleigh, being the chief electrician. He says he had nothing to do with the erection and inspection of the poles,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Britton v. Central Union Telephone Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1904
  2. Williams v. Choctaw, O. & G. R.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1906
  3. Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. BillsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1904
  4. Bean-Chamberlain Mfg. Co. v. Standard Spoke & Nipple Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1904

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. HickmanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1918
  2. Jupollo Public Service Co. v. GrantCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API