Legal Opinion

Abulashvili v. Attorney General of the United States

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided November 15, 2011No. 08-2756, 09-2560PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McKEE, Chief Judge.

Petitioners Vasil Abulashvili and Teona Klibadze seek review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing their application for withholding of removal and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”) and an order of the BIA denying their motion to reopen. For the reasons explained below, we hold that the BIA erred in dismissing the Petitioners’ application for asylum because the agency’s adverse credibility determination is not supported by substantial evidence. We also hold that the BIA abused its discretion in denying the motion to reopen.…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-ZacariasSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. VenturaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Olufemi Yussef Abdulai v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  5. Marshall v. Jerrico, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Gao v. SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
  2. Ever Serrano-Alberto v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
  3. Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Kwan Ho Wu v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
  5. Mambom v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API