Legal Opinion

In Re Herrera

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida.

Decided June 5, 2008No. 19-11325PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER (1) DENYING DEBTOR’S MOTION FOR CONTEMPT BUT COMPELLING ATTORNEY FULLERTON TO TURNOVER DOCUMENTS; AND (2) DENYING FULLERTON’S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS

ROBERT A. MARK, Bankruptcy Judge.

The motions before the Court raise three issues: (1) Can an attorney in possession of a Chapter 7 debtor’s documents refuse to turn over the documents based upon the attorney’s retaining lien; (2) if turnover is required, is the attorney entitled to a replacement lien or administrative expense claim; and (3) if so, how should the court value the replacement lien or administrative expense.

Factual and Procedural…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Jarax International, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 1987
  2. Matter of MatassiniUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1988
  3. Direnfeld, Greene & Blackburn Co. v. Olmsted Utility, Inc. (In Re Olmsted Utility, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1991

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dymarkowski v. Savage (In re Hadley)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2015
  2. Alessi Family Ltd. Partnership v. Centurion Development, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2017
  3. In re: Eletson Holdings Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API