Legal Opinion

Dickson v. Sandefur

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 15, 1965No. 10478PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GLADNEY, Judge.

C. Bickham Dickson, Jr., for himself and as tutor for his minor children, C. Bickham *76Dickson III and Michael Augustus Dickson, instituted this, a possessory action, against twenty-three named defendants. Five of these were dismissed from the suit by voluntary action, thus leaving eighteen defendants.1 A number of the defendants filed dilatory exceptions which included misjoinder of parties defendant and improper cumulation of actions. After a hearing by the district court, plaintiffs’ suit was dismissed as to all defendants, from which ruling this appeal has been perfected.

The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gill v. City of Lake CharlesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
  2. McGee v. CollinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  3. Board of Com'rs of Orleans Levee Dist. v. ShushanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
  4. Lykes Bros. Ripley S. S. Co. v. Wiegand Marionneaux Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
  5. Louisiana Western Railroad v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1881

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Debs v. Sunrise Homes, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
  2. General Elec. Co. v. DugasLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1988
  3. Dickson v. SandefurSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API