Legal Opinion

Kay v. Federal Rubber Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided December 3, 1930No. 4526PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON, District Judge.

This is a petition for the allowance of an appeal from, and for supersedeas of, an order entered by Judge Kirkpatrick of the District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on October 24, 1930, denying the motion of the alleged bankrupt to dismiss the petition in bankruptcy and granting leave to the petitioning creditors to amend the said petition. This application properly comes under section 24b of the Bankruptcy Act (11 USCA § 47(b). The ease was as fully argued as upon appeal. The question whether or not the appeal should be allowed involves the same…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hark v. C. M. Allen Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1906
  2. In re RothenbergDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1905
  3. Knittel v. McGowanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1905

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In Re All Media Properties, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 1980
  2. Georgia Jewelers, Inc., Alleged Bankrupt v. Bulova Watch Co., Golden Shield Corporation, Gruen Watch Co., and Columbia Diamond Ring CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
  3. In Re ThomasDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1962
  4. Abramson v. BoedekerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  5. Matter of Elsub Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API