Commonwealth v. Madigan
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant was found guilty of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor on June 16, 1993. As directed by G. L. c. 90, § 24(1) (e), in cases where no blood-alcohol test results have been put in evidence, the judge instructed the jury of the procedures the police must follow, in offering the defendant a breathalyzer test and the opportunity for a blood test. See Commonwealth v. Alano, 388 Mass. 871, 874 (1983), and G. L. c. 263, § 5A. This instruction was later held in Commonwealth v. Zevitas, 418 Mass. 677, 683 (1994), to violate the self-incrimination…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MirandaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
- DeJoinville v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Commonwealth v. FigueroaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- Commonwealth v. AlanoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Commonwealth v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995