Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Madigan

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided May 23, 1995No. 94-P-1468PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant was found guilty of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor on June 16, 1993. As directed by G. L. c. 90, § 24(1) (e), in cases where no blood-alcohol test results have been put in evidence, the judge instructed the jury of the procedures the police must follow, in offering the defendant a breathalyzer test and the opportunity for a blood test. See Commonwealth v. Alano, 388 Mass. 871, 874 (1983), and G. L. c. 263, § 5A. This instruction was later held in Commonwealth v. Zevitas, 418 Mass. 677, 683 (1994), to violate the self-incrimination…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MirandaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
  2. DeJoinville v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  3. Commonwealth v. FigueroaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  4. Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  5. Commonwealth v. AlanoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API