Legal Opinion

Marte v. Berkman

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 5, 2011PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The judgment of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs, and the certified question not answered upon the ground that it is unnecessary.

“While express consent to a mistrial is preferable, defendant’s consent may in some cases be implied from the circumstances leading up to the dismissal of the jury” and the question of whether the defense consented to a mistrial involves a factual determination by the lower courts that may not be disturbed by this Court if there is any support for that finding in the record (People v Ferguson, 67 NY2d 383,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. FergusonNew York Court of Appeals · 1986

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Marte v. VanceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
  2. People v. StewartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. People v. GreenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  4. People v. AlmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
  5. Stanley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API