Legal Opinion
United States v. David Guardino
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 14, 1992No. 91-5552, 91-6423PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RYAN, Circuit Judge.
These are consolidated appeals by defendant David Guardino from decisions of the district court denying Guardino’s motions to correct his sentence by reducing the amount of the restitution ordered, No. 91-5552, and to direct the Bureau of Prisons to produce a document, No. 91-6423. We reverse the denial of Guardino’s restitution motion, and affirm the denial of the document production motion.
I
Guardino is a “telephone psychic” who went astray. Clients to whom Guardino gave advice often elected to pay for the consultation by authorizing Guardino to make a charge on their…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hughey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. Ernest J. Badaracco, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Richard Lee HatfieldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- United States v. Francis A. KoeberleinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Ronald L. TunningCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Jesse James VandebergCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. GrimesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- John W. Gall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.