Legal Opinion · Dissent
Steiner, Crum & Weil v. Smith Sons Lumber Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided May 4, 1922No. 3 Div. 549Published
1Dissent
GARDNER, X
(dissenting). My views upon the question of the construction of the contract here involved are fully stated in the majority opinion on former appeal (Smith Sons Lumber Go. v. Steiner, Crum & Weil, 204 Ala. 306, 85 South. 758), and need no restatement here. I adhere to those views, and therefore respectfully dissent.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Smith Sons Lumber Co. v. Steiner, Crum WeilSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920