Legal Opinion · Dissent

Steiner, Crum & Weil v. Smith Sons Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 4, 1922No. 3 Div. 549Published

1Dissent

GARDNER, X

(dissenting). My views upon the question of the construction of the contract here involved are fully stated in the majority opinion on former appeal (Smith Sons Lumber Go. v. Steiner, Crum & Weil, 204 Ala. 306, 85 South. 758), and need no restatement here. I adhere to those views, and therefore respectfully dissent.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith Sons Lumber Co. v. Steiner, Crum WeilSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920