Legal Opinion

Wonalancet Co. v. Banfield

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 25, 1933PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBanks, J.

The defendants are the directors and trustees in liquidation of The Birge Company, which in October and November, 1929, executed three written contracts in which it agreed -to buy from the plaintiff a total of thirty-five, bales .of cotton material, shipments to be made as specified by The Birge Company, and payments to be made within thirty days from the date of .invoice. In accordance, with the terms of the contracts, the plaintiff, on- divers dates up to May 25th, 1931, shipped' nine bales of material to The Birge Company, but the latter company has failed to specify shipments-of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dingley v. OlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Wells v. Hartford Manilla Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1903
  3. Finlay v. SwirskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Martin v. KavanewskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  2. Weiss v. Sheet Metal Fabricators, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1955
  3. Gilman v. PedersenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  4. C. W. Blomquist & Co. v. Capital Area Realty Investors Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  5. M. Shapiro & Son Construction Co. v. BattagliaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API