Legal Opinion

Wright v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 24, 1990No. 89-02997PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

After reviewing the briefs and record on appeal, we find that the appellant has *1314failed to demonstrate any reversible error, and therefore, the judgments and sentences are affirmed. However, the trial court’s written order of judgment and sentence varied from its oral pronouncement at sentencing in open court. The written order of judgment and sentence recited that the appellant was guilty of possession of cocaine with intent to sell or deliver and imposed a fine. The trial court at the sentencing hearing adjudicated the appellant guilty of the lesser included offense of possession of cocaine…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Perez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API