Legal Opinion

MacHala v. Weems

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided October 10, 2001No. 06-00-00133-CVPublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Justice GRANT.

Leroy G. Machala, Margaret A. Janik, Stanley Machala, Floyd F. Wolcik, Lucille Martin, Wilbur Krenek, and Floyd Stas-ney, Appellants, sued D. Ted Weems, Ap-pellee, for declaratory, injunctive, and other relief regarding Weems’s alleged interference with Appellants’ alleged easement over certain Harris County property owned by Weems. Weems counterclaimed, seeking the trial court’s declaration that Appellants have no right, title, or interest in any of the property belonging to him.

After a bench trial, the trial court rendered a take-nothing judgment against Appellants…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Dow Chemical Co. v. FrancisTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Sterner v. Marathon Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Strackbein v. PrewittTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Drye v. Eagle Rock Ranch, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1963

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Allen v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2008
  2. Betts v. Reed, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2005
  3. Reed v. Wright, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2005
  4. Martin v. Cockrell, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2010
  5. Tiller v. Lake Alexander Properties, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API