Legal Opinion · Concurrence

St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Brady

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 23, 1995No. 92-614Published

1ConcurrenceRobert L. Brown, Justice

This appeal concerns what caused Mr. Brady’s blood clot which led to his death. In my judgment, substantial proof was introduced to support a jury finding that the second fall was the proximate cause. The majority opinion states that no conclusion was reached by a medical doctor on the cause of Mr. Brady’s blood clot. But a medical conclusion concerning causation is not required for the matter to go to the jury. Here, Dr. Bell’s initial opinion was that trauma from one of the two falls “most likely” caused the blood clot. That testimony coupled with testimony from three witnesses concerning…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stacks v. Arkansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  2. Hall v. GrimmettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  3. Hill v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  4. Curbo v. HarlanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  5. Chambliss v. BrintonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API