Legal Opinion
Republic Supply Co. of California v. Richfield Oil Co. of California
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 9, 1935No. 7812PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ST. SURE, District Judge.
From a decree of the District Court, adopting and confirming findings and conclusions of a special master concerning a claim of Universal Consolidated Oil Company (hereinafter called Universal) against the receiver of the Richfield Oil Company of California (hereinafter called Richfield) and the Security First National Bank of Los Angeles (hereinafter called the bank) appeal and cross-appeal have been prosecuted.
At the time of the commencement of this proceeding Richfield was in equitable receivership. Universal filed a bill in intervention against the receiver and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Peters v. BainSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Schuyler v. LittlefieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Empire State Surety Co. v. Carroll CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
- Board of Com'rs v. StrawnCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1907
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Merrill v. Abbott (In Re Independent Clearing House Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 1984
- The Depot, Inc. v. Caring for Montanans, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Landwehr v. DuPreeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Pajaro Dunes Rental Agency, Inc. v. Spitters (In Re Pajaro Dunes Rental Agency, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 1994
- Emerson v. Maples (In Re Mark Benskin & Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1993
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.