Legal Opinion

Sears v. Waste Processing Equipment

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided March 21, 1997No. 2951327PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Paulette Sears sued Waste Processing Equipment, Inc., d/b/a Max-Pak, alleging that an industrial-sized cardboard waste compactor manufactured by Max-Pak had caused her injury and that the compactor was defective within the meaning of the Alabama Extended Manufacturer's Liability Doctrine (AEMLD). Max-Pak moved for a summary judgment; the trial court granted the motion and entered a judgment in favor of Max-Pak. Sears appealed to the supreme court. Her appeal was transferred to this court, pursuant to § 12-2-7(6), Ala. Code 1975.

Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to Sears,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hicks v. Commercial Union Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  2. McDonald v. ServproCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  3. Hinkle v. BURGREEN CONTRACTING CO., INC.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1996

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Horn v. Fadal MacHining Centers, LLCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  2. Pittman v. United Toll Systems, LLCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  3. Ex Parte BarranSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  4. GULF SHORES MARINE INDUSTRIES v. EastburnCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1998
  5. Burleson v. RSR Group Florida, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API