Rodgers v. O'Connell
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtNathaniel T. Helman, J.
This is a motion under rules 106 and 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice to dismiss the complaint on the grounds that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and on the grounds that the court does not have jurisdiction of the subject of the action.
*63The complaint alleges three causes of action; the first cause alleges that plaintiff was laid off improperly because defendant union failed to invoke the layoff procedure required by the contract between his union and employer, resulting in damages to plaintiff amounting to $4,000 in earnings, and preventing…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Garner v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union No. 776Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Dusing v. NuzzoNew York Supreme Court · 1941
- Havens v. DodgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Honegger v. O'ConnellNew York Supreme Court · 1961
- Courtney v. Marcus Loew Booking AgencyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kominski v. Western Express Co.New York Supreme Court · 1962